Return to site

Which Came First Pubg Or Fortnite

broken image


  1. Which Came First Pubg Or Fortnite
  2. Which Came First Pubg Or Fortnite Season
  3. Fortnite Vs Pubg
  4. Was Fortnite Made Before Pubg

With that said, though, PUBG came first. In fact, Fortnite: BRonly exists because Epic Games — having spent five years developing a 'Save the World' Player vs Environment (PvE) experience and releasing it to an underwhelming reception — saw the success of PUBGand churned out a clone of it as quickly as they could. The studio saw how insanely popular PUBG is, realized it could do something similar in Fortnite, and bam, Fortnite's Battle Royale mode was born. Epic even mentioned in its original Battle Royale mode announcement that it was inspired by games like H1Z1 and PUBG, something which Bluehole also took issue with since Epic apparently hadn't.

Unless you were living under a sidewalk for the past six months, you've probably heard one of your gamer friends rant on about the infant battle royale genre. There are currently two main competitors out in the field, Bluehole's and Epic Games' . https://herexfile953.weebly.com/apple-mac-boot-from-usb.html.

You've most likely already seen some of our thoughts and comments about , but Fortnite is still relatively new to the battle royale arena and what better way is there to have one thing say something about the other thing than putting thing two next to thing one and watching them gossip over one another.

Well. Now that everyone is suitably confused, let us proceed in a more orderly fashion.

The first thing likely to poke your eyes out is the visual difference between the two games. PUBG is definitely aiming for a more realistic depiction of fictional island-wide murder rampages, while Fortnite is content with a more cartoony artstyle.

Epic Games The visual difference between the two games

This distinction goes a lot deeper though, as the divide between the two games on their approach to realism extends into mechanics as well. You do have to lead your shots and take bullet drop into account for both games, but PUBG demands a lot more precision while doing so. Where PUBG has realism going for it, Fortnite has a few more silly things going on like jump pads and electric floor traps.

A lot of the things that Fortnite brings to the table are derived from the game's primary game mode. This soon-to-be secondary game mode features a lot of construction and PvE horde management elements that translate into the battle royale version with varying degrees of gel. What the construction mechanics, obviously absent in PUBG, add to the experience is the ability to instantly create cover, build bridges or platforms to aid in terrain traversal, and any number of tricks you can think of. On the other hand, most objects in Fortnite are destructible, so a house or barn that seemed like a safe place for a bit of a lie-down a moment ago, might be entirely gone after a few well placed grenades or shotgun blasts.

Epic Games Fortnite features fully destructible buildings

What PUBG lacks in the construction department it more than makes up with its transportation options. Vehicles and all the intricacies of operating them in PUBG haven't made an appearance in Fortnite yet. Navigation of the two games' large maps is solved a lot more elegantly in PUBG. Fortnite will let you reach pretty much any place on the map with your first jump regardless of where the battle-bus flies over. As with most things related to depth and complexity, PUBG has a clear advantage here, but not everyone enjoys complexity or depth in their games, so, as always, personal preference plays a huge role here.

First
Which Came First Pubg Or Fortnite

Bluehole Studio Drive around in style in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds

Bluehole have expressed some over Epic Games releasing their own battle royale game in the past. At the time they said it was due to concerns of epic profiting off their work with the Unreal engine, which both games use and Epic develops and owns. These concerns are only mildly justified. Between the two games Fortnite runs a lot better, allowing for playable framerates suitable for its simpler mechanics even on older machines, while PUBG is already notorious as a resource hog.

Epic Games Fortnite Battle Royale system requirements

To make matters more complicated, PUBG demands precision gameplay but doesn't provide much in the way of stable performance. Never a good combination for a game with eSport ambitions. This is by no means a result of industrial espionage on Epic's part. They simply know their own engine better than Bluehole does, and the performance bar is set a lot lower for Fortnite than it is for PUBG.

The elephant in the room is and was the fact that Fortnite Battle Royale is a free to play title, where PUBG has an up-front price, with microtransactions on the horizon. This may have been the chief cause for Bluehole's concernes in the past, as a lot of potential future customers who don't buy early access games are likely to be playing Fortnite by now.

Epic Games Fortnite is free to play, whereas PUBG costs money

In essence - if you are curious about the battle royale genre, Fortnite is a no-cost way of satisfying your curiosity regarding systems and mechanics, and you may even enjoy it in the long run. Those who are already familiar with Battle Royale and are looking for a more realistic and challenging experience are better served with PUBG.

It's inevitable: every time a wildly successful video game comes along, imitators quickly follow in its footsteps. The tradition began with Pong and Pac-Man clones, and that practice has continued on PCs, consoles, and smartphones ever since. 'Homages' at best and 'blatant ripoffs' at worst have always been a part of the game industry.

I couldn't help but think of this after my first thrilling time playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds in May of this year. You may have heard about this PC game: it's a somewhat familiar-looking military shooter, albeit with clever rules that gradually force dozens of players to a giant island's random 'center' point. The result feels like a video game version of the Japanese film Battle Royale. The 'early access' game is also setting records for concurrent player counts on Steam—which is particularly wild considering it costs $39.99, as opposed to popular free-to-play games like Dota 2.

Before the player counts climbed sky-high, however, I had already predicted a very PUBG future. 'How long until other games rip this off?' I said to my online team via voice chat, shortly after I was sniped while foolishly running across one of PUBG's open fields.

The answer: about half a year. Other game studios have hinted at attaching PUBG-like modes to their own franchises, but Fortnite, the 'eventually free-to-play' co-op shooter from Epic Games, is possibly the first big-studio game to go all-in with PUBG fever. Its new player-versus-player (PvP) mode, dubbed 'Battle Royale,' shoehorns many of PUBG's ideas into Fortnite's take on crafting and gunplay. This mode is currently in a limited test state, but it will soon become entirely free to play for all PC and PS4 gamers starting Tuesday, September 26.

Ahead of that wider public launch, PUBG's publishing team at Bluehole Inc. made a pretty strong statement on Friday. It reads like a warning shot before a major conflict. So this seems like a good time to look at the statement, at the ecosystem of games that imitate other games, and at my impressions of the very PUBG-like mode currently being tested in Fortnite. The meaty question: can other companies pull off such a tribute, either in practical or fun-factor ways?

'Replicating the experience'

Which Came First Pubg Or Fortnite

Let's start with Bluehole's Friday statement, which the company describes as 'a response to community concern'—meaning, not a declaration of legal intent.

The money quote from the statement comes from Bluehole VP Chang Han Kim: 'After listening to the growing feedback from our community and reviewing [Fortnite Battle Royale's] gameplay for ourselves, we are concerned that Fortnite may be replicating the experience for which PUBG is known.'

Sims 4 minimum system requirements. After that, Kim points out how often Epic has specifically called PUBG out by name while promoting Fortnite's new mode, which he says is 'not right.' (In one example, Epic announced the game's new mode by saying, 'We love Battle Royale games like PUBG and thought Fortnite would make a great foundation for our own version.')

There's a mention of 'an ongoing relationship with Epic Games throughout PUBG's development,' but Kim doesn't specify what that exactly means or whether it hints at any legally actionable issue of 'stolen' work or violations of any private agreements between the companies. PUBG uses Epic's Unreal Engine 4 product, which Fortnite also uses to render its 3D content. (Update: After this article was written, Bluehole clarified to PC Gamer that this arrangement was indeed the crux of its initial statement.)

The statement takes an unusual step of acknowledging a devil's-advocate quote about PUBG-like games from the game's creator, Brendan 'PlayerUnknown' Greene: 'Other companies will, of course, enter the marketplace, but I would just hope they put their own spin on the game mode and not just make a carbon copy!'

Advertisement

The statement concludes with this vague hint at what's to come: 'The PUBG community has and continues to provide evidence of the many similarities as we contemplate further action,' Kim says.

Legal precedent?

Bluehole seems to be intentionally vague in this statement, perhaps owing to the letter's 'response to community concern' premise. Bluehole's staff, including developers of its games, are no strangers to responding to their online communities, and remaining silent in the face of fan response probably isn't an option. But walking up to the precipice of action and instead merely expressing grave 'concern' leads to important followup questions. What exactly is being replicated? And what action could Bluehole actually take? Like, could Bluehole actually get anywhere near suing Epic?

Very few allegations of 'your game copied my game' go to trial. As Steve Golson, a developer of the original Ms. Pac-Man clone Crazy Otto, told a GDC crowd in March 2016, game companies have traditionally been timid about suing 'copycat' game makers and thus letting courts set sweeping precedents. In Golson's case, he believed that if a hacker or modder got a favorable ruling, that could have much more impact on a publisher's bottom line than if bigger companies' cases were upheld.

In one of the industry's few cases that went to trial, Atari triumphed over Philips in 1982 in alleging that the game K.C. Munchkin copied Pac-Man. That same year, Nintendo won out in a defense against Universal Pictures' claim that Donkey Kong had ripped off the film King Kong—which, of course, isn't the same thing. Other game-copying cases, particularly Sega and EA's face-off over similarities between Crazy Taxi and Simpsons Road Rage, tend to slide into a quieter settlement phase.

Which Came First Pubg Or Fortnite Season

They're. pretty similar

Perhaps Bluehole and Epic will find themselves squaring off with lawyers at a settlement-minded table—at least, if Sega and EA's settlement precedent is compared to how similar Fortnite Battle Royale is to PUBG.

As an owner of Fortnite's 'Founders Pack' DLC, I'm able to log in to the game right now and test the new Battle Royale mode. Game pigeon iphone 4. The mechanical and presentation similarities are, in short, pretty glaring.

Every match of PUBG begins with up to 99 players running around in a 'safe zone' on the game's map for about 90 seconds. During that time, they can practice running around and shooting guns before the match begins. The exact same can be said for Fortnite Battle Royale.

Every match of PUBG continues with all 99 players getting onto an airplane that flies a random straight-line trajectory over a single 8km x 8km island. Players can choose to jump out at any time, at which point they then aim their own freefall drop onto the landmass before a parachute opens for a slower final descent.

Fortnite Battle Royale does the exact same thing, albeit on a different map made up of Fortnite-specific land masses, structures, and buildings. Fortnite's map may not be exactly 8km x 8km in size, but cursory tests suggest a very similar island size. (Also, Fortnite Battle Royale's 'plane' looks more like a flying bus, but it appears at nearly an identical camera angle as PUBG's plane.)

After all players have landed in PUBG, a minute passes before a random 'safe zone' radius appears on the map, which all players have two minutes and 30 seconds to run toward before a slowly creeping, blue-transparent field of poison takes over the island. Whilst scrambling toward safety, PUBG players run into buildings and scour them for weapons, ammo, armor, and healing items. The poison field stops at the circular radius shown on PUBG's map, and then a new, smaller, randomly generated radius appears inside the original radius, which players are given less time to run toward. This cycle of poison cloud and 'safe zone radius' generation continues, with the poison cloud becoming more damaging as the match progresses.

That entire paragraph: exactly the same in Fortnite Battle Royale. (Even the poison cloud looks nearly identical.)

Advertisement

So what's different? Well, Fortnite is nowhere near emulating the shooting model that makes PUBG so satisfying, let alone PUBG's sound-modeling system that both replicates realistic gunfire in the distance and offers tremendous 'perpendicular sound' cues to help players know exactly where a shot might come from. Fortnite Reference tracker 2 2. was clearly built for more active and arcade-y player-versus-environment (PvE) shooting, and many of its lower-level weapons are severely lacking in accuracy. This genre of game demands careful, sneaky play in order to survive as players run to an eventual center point. There's something that just feels funky about filling such a shooting game with stuff better suited for shooting at waves of AI-controlled zombies.

PUBG's selection of cars, dune buggies, and boats is also nowhere to be found, at least in this testing phase. This disrupts some of the fun of PUBG, which uses vehicles as both a getaway device and an organic moth-to-flame system for getting combatants to find each other.

Instead of vehicles, Fortnite carries over its default crafting systems, which are somewhat limited in this Battle Royale variant. Players start with a pickaxe that can be used to break down objects in the world. With the resulting wood, bricks, and steel, players can build surfaces, walls, and stairs (but not weapons or traps). I've already seen this play out in weird ways in Fortnite Battle Royale. Players who might otherwise be totally vulnerable in an open field will pause and build protective walls that they can hide behind. I've also seen players reach a tinier safety radius, then build giant stairwells, structures, and barriers in the sky, climb up them, and begin sniping from their makeshift sniper towers. Should the poison radius narrow in an unwelcome way, those high-up snipers will build a floating bridge toward safety.

Super Mario vs. Super Luigi?

I've generally had fun in Fortnite's new mode, though that's mostly because it resembles the stuff I already like in PUBG. As far as its differences, I'm not sure that being able to build and destroy structures either improves a PUBG clone or makes logical sense. One of the most important gameplay challenges in PUBG is managing a combination of varied terrain, long-distance viewing lines, and rapidly changing poison-radius zones. Being able to craft your way into safety creates a whole new set of superpowers that deserves balancing and attention. Epic's take definitely feels like a sloppy, inefficient addition to the formula that's being aped—yet it's also the crucial differentiating factor that Epic might point to when saying, 'Look, this is a unique game!'

But other Fortnite-specific elements, particularly traps and tower-defense elements, don't fully appear in Fortnite Battle Royale as of yet. I've seen a shock-trap here and a bounce-pad there, but they don't figure into the early testing combat anywhere near as much as in standard Fortnite. Embracing and implementing the game's unique attributes would go a long way toward Epic delivering something that looks similar yet different. As of right now, thanks to so many glaring mechanical and aesthetic similarities, this current comparison isn't Super Mario vs. Sonic the Hedgehog. This might be closer to Super Mario vs. Super Luigi.

And if you want to point to other games that are similar to PUBG, like H1Z1 King of the Kill or the Battle Royale mods in ARMA II and ARMA III, go right ahead. Just know that Brendan 'PlayerUnknown' Greene had a lead role in developing all three of those, as well.

Fortnite Vs Pubg

Should Bluehole actually take a legal swing at how similar the games appear—there's no evidence that will happen—they may have recourse in South Korean courts, considering Epic Games has a South Korean office, but it's unclear whether that office could easily be targeted in court for actions that may have been taken by Epic's other offices. However, it'd be rich irony if Bluehole took Epic to court in South Korea, as the company lost in a major case filed by fellow South Korean developer NCSoft over stolen assets in Bluehole's game Lineage 3.

PUBG and Battle Royale clones are certainly going to continue coming, if statements from the likes of Ubisoft are to be taken seriously. Those games will certainly employ some of PUBG's overarching concepts, particularly shrinking safety zones, to emulate PUBG's pace, game lengths, and intensity. Who knows, maybe Fortnite's version will eventually pass muster with some patches and changes—which might be all Bluehole wants in order to avoid a legal battle over what it apparently sees as 'replications' of its IP.

Was Fortnite Made Before Pubg

But this sort of public statement just as much risks earning ire from fans who are used to games building off of each other—especially in PUBG Free 4d animation software. 's case, whose origins as a popular mod came off the shoulders of other engines' and games' shoulders. https://ameblo.jp/stelinim-nenx/entry-12650724718.html.





broken image